Faure, Bernard. Translated by Phyllis Brooks. Princeton, N.J.:
Princeton University Press, 1996. xvi+329 pp. $45.00 (cloth).
Most of those who will read this book will have already read Bernard
Faure's previous volumes from Princeton, The Rhetoric of Immediacy
(1991) and Chan Insights and Oversights (1993), the two most
important works on Chan and Zen ever published in a Western
language. Therefore, many will approach this book wanting to know
its relationship with those two. As Faure tells us, the fact that
the present work was originally written for a French audience means
that it uses some of the same materials found in the earlier books;
but he hopes that readers will find this one "complementary, not
redundant" (p. xiii). I found it complementary. Other readers should
be warned, however, that if they intend to pursue a particular topic
in the Chan/Zen tradition, they may find this volume redundant. For
some topics, such as the Arhats in East Asia (pp. 88-96) or the
Japanese kami (pp. 96-113), they will find the fuller discussion
here. For other topics, however, much of the same information is
given as before, and many are discussed more satisfactorily in one
of the other two volumes (e.g., death and relics in Rhetoric). On at
least one occasion (p. 238), I realized I had already read virtually
the same sentences elsewhere (Rhetoric, p. 170).
The book is nevertheless complementary for two reasons: its focus on
the texts relating to a single individual, and its use of the idea
of imaginaire to understand those texts. The individual is Keizan
Jokin (1268-1325), third in succession to Dogen (1200-53), the
founder of the Japanese Soto "sect" of Zen. Keizan has been seen by
previous scholars as a reformer, adapting his religion to local
conditions and accommodating esoteric Buddhism to make Soto a
powerful institution. As a result, he has been referred to as the
"second founder" of Soto. Faure has not written a biography of
Keizan. Instead, he concentrates on the texts attributed to him,
particularly the Records of Tokoku, a heterogeneous text for which
Keizan was only partly responsible.
Faure concentrates on this particular text, rather than on the more
"ideological" texts for which Keizan's authorship is surer, because
it allows him to explore the Zen imaginaire of early
fourteenth-century Japan. Following Jacques Le Goff's studies of the
European Middle Ages, Faure uses this term to indicate "the way