《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Introduction >>

Visions of Power: Imagining Medieval Japanese Buddhism(2)

分享到:

      beliefs are rendered into images" (p. 3) that mediates, among other
      things, "form and formlessness" (p. 281). The products of this
      medieval imaginaire--icons, myths, local deities, relics, and much
      more--are the very things that Zen ideology calls into question. The
      premise of this volume (and in various fashions of all Faure's work)
      is that this imaginaire was from the very beginning as present in
      Zen as were discourses on emptiness and enlightenment. Its presence
      in Keizan's universe, therefore, cannot be attributed solely to
      popularizing and esoteric syncretism. In his own way, Faure must
      once again struggle as mightily as any Mahayana thinker ever did
      with the "two truths"--although in a modern idiom of enormous
      erudition--in order to show us how a man whose religious ideology
      rejected all imagination could describe himself as having been a
      tree-deity "with the head of a dog, the body of a kite, and the
      belly and tail of a serpent" (p. 30).
      The genres of Keizan's imaginaire, furthermore, are not his, but
      extend backward and forward in time, so that his text seeks to
      homologize its expressions with what he perceives as eternal ones.
      In the end, Faure cannot recover Keizan except as an intersection of
      East Asian thoughts and images at a particular moment and place. He,
      too, must move forward and backward in time, from China to Japan and
      back, away from and toward Keizan. It is this last movement that
      impresses most and distinguishes this book from Faure's previous
      work. Here we have an intellectual biography that does not so much
      place an individual in history as find a history in an individual.
      Finally, Faure's use of Le Goff's terms suggests the possibility of
      mutually illuminating comparisons with parallel studies of medieval
      Europe. Faure, along with others such as Carl Bielefeldt and William
      Bodiford, has reconstructed the study of Zen as a religion to the
      point that scholars of religion generally should begin turning to
      this field to find what they would not expect: a rich tradition of
      icons, rituals, myths, and magical power. This volume is the best
      place for them to start.