《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Research >>

DŌGEN STUDIES IN AMERICA:THOUGHTS ON THE STATE OF T(7)

分享到:

[19]How to Raise an Ox:  Zen Practice as Taught in Zen Master Dōgen’s Shōbō genzō (3d ed.; Los Angeles:  Center Publications, 1990); Sounds of the Valley Streams:  Enlightenment in Dōgen’s Zen  (SUNY Press, 1988) (both rendering selections from the Shōbōgenzō).

[20]Flowers of Emptiness:  Selections from Dōgen’s Shōbōgenzō (Lewiston, N. Y. and Queenston, Ontari  E. Mellen Press, 1985).

[21]Moon in a Dewdrop, with others (San Francisc  North Point, 1986) (containing selections from the Shōbōgenzō and other texts).

[22]Refining Your Life  (Weatherhill, 1983) (translation of the Tenzo kyōkun, with commentary by Uchiyama Kōshō Rōshi).

[23]The Shōbōgenzō (Toky  Sankibō Busshorin, 1986; originally published in separate fascicles, 1985-86); The Eihei-kōroku (Sankibō, 1987).  Recently, the Kyoto Soto-Zen Center has been particularly active in publishing on Dōgen in English; see, e. g., Okumura Shohaku, Shobogenzo-zuimonki:  Sayings of Eihei Dogen Zenji (Kyoto, 1987); Okumura, Dogen Zen (1988).

[24]Hawaii, 1985.  Prof. Kasulis once offered his own perspective on the English materials on Dōgen; see “The Zen Philosopher:  A Review Article on Dōgen Scholarship in English,” Philosophy East and West 28:3 (7/78).

[25]SUNY Press, 1985.  See also Prof. Heine’s A Blade of Grass:  Japanese Poetry and Aesthetics in Dōgen Zen  (P. Lang, 1989).  He has published a review of several translations of and articles on Dōgen in “Truth and Method in Dōgen Scholarship:  A Review of Recent Works,” EB 20: 2 (Autumn 1987).

[26]SUNY Press, 1985.

[27]Hawaii, 1990.  Though as far as I know it has not yet issued in a book, mention should also be made here of the excellent philosophical work of John Maraldo; see, e. g., his piece in Dōgen Studies (for which, see below, note 33) or “The Hermeneutics of Practice in Dōgen and Francis of Assisi:  An Exercise in Buddhist-Christian Dialogue,” EB 14: 2 (Autumn 1981).

[28]As one prominent Zen philosopher has said of my own work, we want to see only the “horizontal,” not the “vertical,” dimension of Zen.

[29]Dōgen’s Manuals of Zen Meditation (Berkeley:  University of California Press, 1988).

[30]Dōgen’s Formative Years in China:  An Historical Study and Annotated Translation of the Hōkyō-ki (Prajñâ Press, 1980).  For a rare Buddhological treatment, see William Grosnick, “The Zen Master Dōgen’s Understanding of the Buddha Nature in Light of the Historical Development of the Buddha Nature Concept in India, China and Japan” (dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1986).

[31]Kyot  Hōzōkan.

[32]New York:  Columbia University Press.

[33]Edited by William LaFleur and published in the Institute’s Studies in East Asian Buddhism series by the University of Hawaii Press.  The book includes papers by Profs. Abe, Kim, Cook, Kasulis, Maraldo, and myself, with an introductory essay by LaFleur and a concluding essay by Robert Bellah.  A second Kuroda Dōgen conference included unpublished papers by the Zen Kenkyūjo’s own Suzuki Kakuzen, as well as Tamaki Kōshirō, Tamura Yoshiro, and others.

[34]Probably the first published product of this interest will be William Bodiford’s excellent “Sōtō Zen in Medieval Japan,” a book manuscript based on research done here at Komazawa under Prof. Ishikawa Rikizan and scheduled to appear in the Kuroda Institute’s Studies in East Asian Buddhism series.