An Analysis of the Buddha's Paradoxical Silence(9)
时间:2008-03-30 10:11来源:本站原创作者:佚名 点击:
Nihilistic view shows that there is no other way to illustrate the
essential reality beyond the dichotomic concepts or logical reasoning.
The only way is to keep silent.
I interpreted the Buddha's silence in response to some of his
followers' metaphysical questions as paradoxical. The paradoxical
expression ignores the principle of non-contradiction. It remains as a
paradox illustrating the ineffable reality. The paradoxical view follows
some logical procedure: (1) either A or B; (2) neither A nor B; (3) not
neither A nor B. In the positive way, the paradoxical view admits some
validity of the words and metaphors to illustrate the ineffable reality.
In contrast, the paradoxical view, same as the Nihilistic view,
admits that words, metaphors, and symbols are not the perfect tools for
illustrating the ineffable realm. In the other perspective, similar to the
metaphoric view, the paradoxical view also admits the limited validities
of these means to be applicable in illustrating the ineffable reality and
making people understand its non-duality. Although words, metaphors,
symbols, and even silence are not the absolute or perfect means, these
are satisfactory instruments that point to or illustrate the ultimate
reality.
Finally, it rejects the previous formulas and uses the paradoxical
logic: not neither A nor B. In this sense, the paradoxical view is neither
the positive view nor the nihilistic view. It uses some progressive
negations of the preceding syllogism in different perspectives. The
Buddha's silence is an example of the paradoxical expression of the
Buddha without relying on words to avoid either Nihilism or
Eternalism.
Glossary of Chinese Terms
(K=Korean, C=Chinese, J=Japanese, S=Sanskrit, P=Pali)
Kwangsoo Park: An Analysis of the Buddha's Paradoxical Silence
262
Bodhidharma (S) 菩堤達摩
Ch'an (C), Seon (K) 禪
Hui-k'o (C) 惠可
Hui-neng (C) 慧能
Hung-yen (C) 弘忍
Shen-hsiu (C) 神樹
Tao-sheng (C) 道生
The La!k2vat2ra-s^tra (S) 楞伽經
The Liu-tsu t'an-ching (C) 六祖壇經
The Tao-te Ching (C) 道德經
The Vimalak6rtinirde$an2-s^tra (C) 維摩詰所說經
Wu (C) 無
Wu-wei (C) 無爲
Abbreviations
S.N. Sa8yutta-Nik2ya
T Taishyō-shinsy-daizōkyō (大正新修大藏經; Japanese Edition of
Chinese Tripi%aka). Tokyō: Taishō-Issaikyō-Kankōkai.
References
Bhattacharya, K.
1971
“The dialectical method of Nagarjuna.” In
Journal of Indian Philosophy. No.1.
Bunyu, Nanjio.
1923
La!k2vat2ra-s^tra Bibliotheca Otaniensis. Vol.1.
Kyoto:
Chan, Wing-tsit.
1963
A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton,
New Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press.
Embree,
Ainslie T.
1988
Sources of Indian Tradition: From the Beginning to
1800 Vol.1. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Fung, Yu-lan
1959
A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. Ed. by
Derk Bodde. New York: Macmillan Co.
International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture
263
Kalupahana,
David J.
The Philosophy of the Middle Way. New York:
State Univ. of New York Press.
Katz,
Steven T. Ed.
1978
Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis. New York:
Oxford Univ. Press.
Lancaster,
Lewis R.
1979
The Korean Buddhist Canon: A Descriptive
Catalogue. In collaboration with Sung-bae Park.
Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Mascaró, Juan
1965 The Upanishads. New York: Viking Penguin.
Meitzen,
Manfred O.
1993
Introduction to Issues in Religious Studies. Acton
MA: Tapestry Press.
Moore, Peter
1978
“Mystical Experience, Mystical Doctrine, Mystical
Technique.” In Mysticism and Philosophical
Analysis. Ed. by Steven T. Katz. New York:
Oxford Univ. Press.
Murti, T.R.V.
1955
The Central Philosophy of Buddhism. London:
George Allen and Unwin.
Nagao,
Gadjin M.
1989
The Foundational Standpoint of Madhyamika
Philosophy. Albany: State Univ. of New York
Press.
1991
Madhyamika and Yogacara: A Study of Mahayana
Philosophies. Ed. and Trans. By L. S. Kawamura.
Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
Organ,
Troy Wilson
1954
“The Silence of the Buddha.” In Philosophy East
and West. 4/2 Honolulu:
Robinson,
Richard H.
1978
Early Madhyamika in India and China. Wisconsin:
Univ. of Wisconsin (1st Ed. 1967. Delhi: Motilal
Banarsidass).
Sopa,
Geshe Lhundup.,
and
Hopkins, Jeffrey
1989
Cutting Through Appearances: Practice and Theory
of Tibetan Buddhism. Ithaca, New York: Snow
Lion Publications.
Kwangsoo Park: An Analysis of the Buddha's Paradoxical Silence
264
Staal, Frits
1975
Exploring Mysticism: A Methodological Essay.
Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: Univ. of
California Press.
Stace, W.T.
1960
Mysticism and Philosophy. Los Angeles: Jeremy P.
Tarcher.
Suzuki, D. T.
1930
Studies in the La!k2vat2ra-s^tra. London: G.
Routledge & sons, Ltd.
Tillich, Paul
1951 Systematic Theology. Chicago:
1955
“Theology and symbolism.” In Religious