THE EMERGENCE OF CH'AN BUDDHISM A REVISIONIST PERSPE(3)
时间:2008-01-23 11:21来源:Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal,vol作者:Charles … 点击:
arm and presenting it to Bodhidharma.(4) The facts
about Seng-ts'an, the third patriarch, are so spare
that even Tao-hsuan, the official historian of the
Ch'an patriarchate, does not accord him separate
treatment. (5) During the tenure of the fourth
patriarch, Tao-hsin,(6) a schism occurred when one
of his disciples, Fa-jung, founded a movement which
(according to Masunaga, and cited by Dumoulin) was
carried to Japan by Dengyo Daishi (the monk, Saicho,
who founded Tendai Buddhism in Japan). As we shall
see, the idea that Ch'an practice could exist within
another sect (T'ien-t'ai in China, Tendai in Japan)
is suggestive concerning the origins of Ch'an as a
separate sect.
Then, after the fifth patriarch, Hung-jen, came
the dramatic schism brought about by the controversy
over who would be the sixth patriarch. Shen-hsiu,
the foremost disciple of Hung-jen, appears to have
been accepted by the majority as deserving the
succession; however, an independent tradition grew
up that the master had secretly designated Hui-neng
as the sixth patriarch. This tradition became
entrenched in the South, and the collapse of the
northern traditions, apparently as a result of the
deat h of Shen-hsius's disciples during the T'ang
persecutions, left the southern tradition in
possession of the field.
Thus, in the normative tradition, Hui-neng,
the Sixth patriarch in the Chinese succession, is
regarded as the "second" and actual founder of
Ch'an, hallowed by many generations of disciples.
Modern scholars who have examined the sources of
bio-
P.394
graphical information about him, the earliest of
which come from the late T'ang and Sung periods, do
not find that these sources inspire confidence.(7)
At the core of the traditions concerning Hui-neng
stands the dramatic episode of his nocturnal, and
therefore secret, succession, and his "flight to the
south" to escape the vengeance of his opponents.
Even Dumoulin, who gives credence to much of the
historical information about Hui-neng, sees the core
of this tradition as a "tendentious invention" aimed
at the enemies of the southern Ch'an schools, which
are represented in this tradition as the legitimate