《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Introduction >>

What is a birth astride a grave?: 'Ohio Impromptu&am(10)

分享到:

      What occurs at the end of the narrative, then, is a final "mindless"
      union of the two into a whole -- not a whole where there are no
      longer protagonist and reader (for that would be to make an absolute
      distinction) but a dynamic one in which the two are
      "without-separation." In other words, the two are still individual,
      but their categorical individuality has been destabilized by the
      koan that is the play. Via this radically decentering force, they
      subsume their egos, their "I-ness," or their subjectivity; they are
      able to pass beyond individual consciousness to a state which
      precedes reflective consciousness, and in which the conceptual
      distinction between self and other cannot be made. They are
      therefore two-in-one and one-in-two.
      If we next expand the study beyond the confines of the internal
      narrative, the relationship of L and R to the listener and the
      reader can be described in similar manner. At first, what goes on on
      stage and what is taking place in the narrative appear to have
      nothing in common, but as the play progresses, these two individual
      entities as well conflow, growing to be as one. The narrative passes
      through the present moment on stage to its future, and stage and
      story achieve a dynamic, intersecting relational cohesion (though
      they are never simply identical). Similarly, the L and R pair also
      becomes one-in-two as they merge with the characters of the internal
      narrative and with each other. What is left is both utterly complex
      and "absurdly simple":(25) all the possible pairings of characters,
      relationships, and actions become a moving montage which, if we drew
      connecting lines between possibly linked characters, would have the
      complexity of a spider's web; yet if we step back from the
      perplexing picture, we can look at the "spider's web" of the play as
      a simple and beautiful whole. And, to carry the web analogy one step
      further, the whole is composed of indispensable and individual
      parts, yet each part is nothing without the whole to give it shape
      and function. Through their repeated ritual readings, the characters
      have learned a new way of being themselves and their world: "When
      the senses reawaken, words fill and flow, becoming so much more than
      the things signified."(26) And once this "reawakening" takes place,
      the world becomes "green again with wonder."(27) Without the need to
      connect causally any two points of time or space, each moment falls
      like the millet grains of Zeno's heap with which Hamm is so taken in