When one has become one's karman, one has gone
beyond discriminating consciousness. One exists
one's karman in the simplicity of suchness. In terms
of the koan, this point can be made by saying that
instead of seeing the fact that the old man was
given a fox body as punishment for a wrong answer to
the question concerning the relationship between
karman and enlightenment, one should simply say,
according to Shibayama Roshi, when a fox, be a fox
completely; when an old man, be an old man
completely. It is most emphatically not a matter of
reward or punishment, right and wrong, truth and
falsity. As always in Zen, the ultimate
consideration is practical and existential: how is
one to live one's karman? The answer is: unite with
it completely, so that there is no trace of
separation from it. This is freedom. Shibayama Roshi
puts this beautifully as follows:
When a fox is really a fox, and not a thought of
discriminating consciousness moves there, he is
truly 'a former head of a monastery.' When an old
man cannot be an old man and goes astray with his
dualistic thinking, he is a fox. Master Dogen said,
"Once you have attained satori, if you were to
transmigrate through the six realms and the four
modes of life, your transmigration would be nothing
but the work of your compassionate life of
satori.(23)
P.85
By implication, I think, the traditional association
of karman with transmigration and rebirth is yet
another example of that discriminating, objectifying
consciousness which seeks to give to karman an
external reality it does not have. If the mind does
not wander, there is in effect neither
transmigration nor rebirth.(24) Believing in these
notions betrays the fact that one is still locating
karman outside oneself. Shibayama Roshi puts this by
speaking of the "ghost-story" aspect of karman: if
you are united with your karman, you are not a
ghost; if you are not a ghost, you do not