Not to wander means to exist each condition and
situation as absolute. When this is the way one
lives, it is literally not possible to wander or
transmigrate in this sense, since there is nowhere
to go when one lives in the absolute. If "here" is
always absolutely here, then there is no "there" at
all. True nomindedness, then, precludes the
possibility of wandering and transmigration by
undermining the very significance-conditions that
would make such a possibility intelligible to begin
with. (As they say in Maine: "You can't get there
from here.")
In conclusion, I think we can agree with R. H.
Blyth's remark that the problem of karman is solved
not by transcending it, but by reaching the ground
of being--thusness.(26) Karman is a great apparent
obstacle to the realization of thusness or suchness
because it perpetually tempts us to engage in the
misguided ways of the relative, objectifying, and
discriminating mind. Our impulse is to try to figure
out how we are related to karman, but once we embark
on this enterprise, we are already hopelessly on te
wrong track, since the whole point of suchness is
that it presupposes a mind free from the habit of
relating itself to anything, including karman. The
moment one tries to figure out one's relationship to
one's karman, one has become separate from it; one
has become a ghost. The Zen move here is to counsel
us to reunite with our karman and stop being ghosts.
In practice, the way of returning to the ground of
being in suchness is simply to forget about how one
is or is not related to one's karman and just become
it. Again: when a fox, be a fox; when an old man, be
an old man. Stop being, once and for all, what
Heidegger once called "a creature of distances."
NOTES
1. Dogen Kigen, Shobogenzo: The Eye and Treasury
of the True Law, trans. Kosen Nishiyama and John
Stevens, Vol. 1 (Sendai, Japan: Daihokkaikaku