《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Research >>

Whitehead's `actual entity' and the Buddha&a(10)

分享到:

      It is memory.... It is a basic element from which
      springs   the  selfcreation   of  each   temporal
      occasion.  Thus  perishing  is the initiation  of
      becoming. How the past perishes is how the future
      becomes." Ibid., p 305.


              p.309

     advance of each actual entity.  Such an advance means
     that  something  novel  is taking  place  or that the
     diversified  world  of elements  becomes  unified  in
     terms of the concrescence of that actual entity. Each
     entity then prehends  the pure potentials  or eternal
     objects  which  constitute  the forms of definiteness
     with respect to the entity.
     In the context of the dynamic novel concrescence of
     each actual entity, the traditional  view of the self
     breaks  down.  Each "self"  is no longer  vacuous  or
     independent;each is coherently related to every other
     entity and each presents  itself potentially  for the
     concrescence by others; and each prehends the eternal
     objects determinately to reveal the nexuus of itself.
     In short, the "self"  is too complex  an entity to be
     easily   analyzed   into  a  system  of  organic   or
     nonorganic structure.  It entails both and much more.
     There  is something  beyond  the perishing  transient
     nature of being.
     It  can  readily  be  seen  in  the  light  of  the
     foregoing  brief discussion  that Whitehead  employed
     quite a sophisticated  vocabulary in order to express
     the elements at play or interplay  in experience, the
     temporal fact. In a way, he was compelled to do so in
     the   hope   of   seeking   greater   adequacy   and
     applicability.  On the whole, he was reacting against
     traditional  beliefs  and modes of thinking  based on
     simple location. He thus admits to the use of
     neologisms.(22)

     ANAATMAN

     As we now turn  to the  Buddha, we find  a remarkably
     similar situation existing.  As with Whitehead, there
     is a reappraisal  of traditional beliefs and modes of
     thinking and the consequent  development  of a unique
     philosophy.  The dominant  view  during  the Buddha's
     times was the Vedaantic  monistic  conception  of the
     universe. Man was part of the whole scheme of things,
     but he generally had a very insignificant  role.  His
     self or personal  soul (jiiva) was for the most  part
     relegated  to an illusory form of existence, and only