p.309
advance of each actual entity. Such an advance means
that something novel is taking place or that the
diversified world of elements becomes unified in
terms of the concrescence of that actual entity. Each
entity then prehends the pure potentials or eternal
objects which constitute the forms of definiteness
with respect to the entity.
In the context of the dynamic novel concrescence of
each actual entity, the traditional view of the self
breaks down. Each "self" is no longer vacuous or
independent;each is coherently related to every other
entity and each presents itself potentially for the
concrescence by others; and each prehends the eternal
objects determinately to reveal the nexuus of itself.
In short, the "self" is too complex an entity to be
easily analyzed into a system of organic or
nonorganic structure. It entails both and much more.
There is something beyond the perishing transient
nature of being.
It can readily be seen in the light of the
foregoing brief discussion that Whitehead employed
quite a sophisticated vocabulary in order to express
the elements at play or interplay in experience, the
temporal fact. In a way, he was compelled to do so in
the hope of seeking greater adequacy and
applicability. On the whole, he was reacting against
traditional beliefs and modes of thinking based on
simple location. He thus admits to the use of
neologisms.(22)
ANAATMAN
As we now turn to the Buddha, we find a remarkably
similar situation existing. As with Whitehead, there
is a reappraisal of traditional beliefs and modes of
thinking and the consequent development of a unique
philosophy. The dominant view during the Buddha's
times was the Vedaantic monistic conception of the
universe. Man was part of the whole scheme of things,
but he generally had a very insignificant role. His
self or personal soul (jiiva) was for the most part
relegated to an illusory form of existence, and only