exist, albeit in a conventional sense. Thus man's
conglomerate existence cannot be reduced to its
parts: he is a unique complex entity in the
becomingness of nature.
In another suutra, the analysis of the five skandhas
goes a step further to condemn them as a burden of
existence.(30) Each one of the skandhas is said to be
corruptible and also the source of suffering
(du.hkha). The reason for this is that the so-called
self or ego is constantly grasping or clinging to the
elements derivable in each of the skandhas. Looked at
from another angle, the assertion of a personal
identity or a self is the fact of the skandhas
burdening or asserting themselves. The burdening
process takes the form of a phenomenon of
permanently settling down or a restraining bond with
respect to the elements of the function despite the
overbearing transient nature of things. A
contradiction then arises in which there is
permanence on the one hand and impermanence on the
other. Such a situation becomes a cause for
uneasiness or delusion, which is a form of suffering.
It can now be seen that a self or aatman would be
difficult to justify in the light of transiency or
impermanence. The other alternative, nonself or
anaatman, fares much better, for it does not have to
adhere strictly to a structural analysis. It is in
constant harmony or rhythm with passage. But now, the
question arises, how does the Buddha explain the
continuity of human experience? At this juncture, he
introduces the concept of dependent or relational
_________________________________
29. Ibid., II. 157. The Dialogues of the Buddha
(London: Luzac & Co., 1959), pt. II, p. 175.
30. Samyutta Nikaaya III. 25. On the Burden.
Translation from The Book of Kindred Sayings, pt.
III, pp. 24-31.
p.313
origination (pratiityasamutpaada), which is commonly
called the Wheel of Life or Becoming. No experience
or event, according to this concept, happens in
isolation. Each arises from and is within a
multidimensional background. Thus the Wheel begins