The middle doctrine or way is never a rational or a
psychological middle. It is not even a balanced
middle between any two points or a middle sought in
any quantitative or qualitative analysis. The
Buddha's message in the passage above is clearly one
of seeking the true unclouded nature of one's own
being, a being which is what it is, or in technical
terms, the thusness of being (yathaabhuutam). The
Buddha's great insight here is to indicate that man
is a constantly bifurcating creature, that he bases
his whole epistemological viewpoints upon the two
extremes (anta) of existence (bhava) and nonexistence
(vibhava, abhava). Or, in more common terms, man
builds up his world of knowledge by implicitly
positing the extremes of something and nothing in the
world, and continues to function in the fashion of an
"either/or" logic, despite the fact that the world of
logic, which is the realm of abstraction, is not
always in one-to-one correspondence with the world of
reality (yathaabhuutam). Nevertheless, man grasps at
a system which is another form of abstraction because
he seeks rational clarity and coherency even at the
expense of losing the more basic aspects of the
nature of total experience. Thus every view,
_____________________________________
23. Proclaimed in the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta of
the Samyutta Nikaaya, V. 420; allegedly the first
words of the Buddha at Sarnath, near Banaras.
24. Samyutta Nikaaya II. 15; also, III. 135. The
translation is from The Book of Kindred Sayings,
trans. Mrs. Rhys Davids, Pali Text Society
Translation Series, no. 10 (London: Luzac & Co.,
1952), pt. II, pp. 12-13.
p.311
concept, or dogma, if unwarily maintained, becomes an
abstract entity in an already abstracted framework.
The meta-metaphysical series or process knows no end