the involuntary separation from or destruction of the
kamas.The vicara and the vitakka, on the other hand,
refer to judgemental deliberations concerning only the
experience of the impermanency of the kamas and the
resultant painful mental states.The vitakka and
vicara, as we shall see later, come to an end before
the attainment of the second jhana.But it does not
mean that the meditator has got rid of all types of
deliberations.There are judgemental deliberations
between any two states of meditation.The judgemental
deliberations prefacing the attainments of the second,
third and fourth jhanas are, however, not
concerned with kama, and so no longer called vitakka
and vicara.( 注 24) Both the vitakka and vicara, and
the akusala-dhammas fall within the range of
experience of an ordinary person.
These mental states are called "not
good"(akusala) for they represent a situation which is
just the opposite of nibbana, the ideal agreeable
feeling.The term akusala is not moral in its
implication; it merely indicates the undesirableness
of a mental state that experientially runs counter to
Nibbana.
In order to critically understand the
implications of the jhana formulas it is necessary to
pay attention to the following principles relevant to
a jhanic state:
──────────────
(23) See pp. 458 of the present article; Digha Nika ?
ya, I, P. 36
(24) Such mental deliberations are called "adhicitta",
higher thoughts.
470 页
1) Mind in concentration can know only one
object at a time.
2) The description of four jhanas stands for four
different types of mental states and include
not only the characteristics connected with
the act of knowing but alos characteristics
indicating the object to be known.For
example the terms sato, sampajanno etc.
refer to the knowing aspect of mind while