with sukha and dukkha, and can disassociate himself
from them.So the ability of mind to know a thing
perfectly is no longer affected by the experience of
dukkha and sukha.The phrase upekkha-satiparisuddhi
should thus mean either "purity of mindfulness due to
equanimity" or "equanimity and purity of
mindfulness."Equanimity is here with reference to
dukkha and sukha, and is not associated with somanassa
and domanassa.
I have accepted the first interpretation, as it
tallies with the explanation given in the Vibhanga.
( 注 30) Upekkha? in this case can in no way be
understood as feeing. The only feeling to be
experienced in the fourth jhana is adukkhamasukham
for the sake of which the comparatively grosser
feeling of sukha of the third jhana had to be given
up. This is the most subtle bodily feeling that a
meditator can experience.It does not hamper at all the
perfect execution of the activity of mindfulness.The
concept of adukkhamasukham as the supreme Nibbana ?
na was not rejected by any group of the
Parama-ditthadhamma-nibbanavadins.
We are now able to critically comment on the
contents of a jhana formula.The jhana formula appears
to be mnemonic statement not only about mental
elements determining the quality of the mind that
experineces and a mental element as an object of
experience but also about the meditative technique and
process leading to the attainment of a jhana.
──────────────
(30) Vibhanga (Rangoon, Burma, Buddhasasana Samiti,
1961) p. 271; H. Gunaratana, ibid. p. 99.
476 页
b)Meditative technique
The Parama-ditthadhamma-nibbanavadins followed an
identical method of meditation before and after the
attainment of t first jhana.In both the cases we read
about the rejection of undesirable mental elements
(e.gkusaladhamma, pitisukha etc. ) but not abou the
wilful and direct cultivation of the desireble
element.This will be clear when we analyse the
spiritual exertions of the followers of this sect.They