Parama-ditthadhamma-nibbanavadins.
(2) Digha Nikaya, Vol. I. pp. 36 ~ 38
(3) See,ibid.pp.34 ~ 35, pp.183ff.Majjhima Nikaya,Vol.
I.pp.33,410,454~55;Dhammasangani (PTS.ED.E.Muller,
19) pp.55ff.etc.
(4) See pp.476~477of the present article, also note no.
31.
458 页
opinion we may point out that even a cursory glance at
the four jhanas recorded in the Buddhist suttas in a
gradually ascending order, will immediately show that
the higher states of meditation invariably reject a
mental factor of the immediately preceding lower
jhanas.The formulations of two such states of
meditation even use identical expression for the
mental factor valued in the lower state but rejected
in the higher state of meditation.On the contrary the
first arupya samapatti which immediately follows the
fourth rupa jhana, does not reject any of the mental
factors attained in the fourth rupa jhana.The first
arupya meditation does not, therefore, appear to have
been necessarily preceded by the fourth rupa jhana.
This objection could be negotiated if we pay
attention to the technical terms characterising the
fourth rupa jhana, viz. adukkhamasukham and purified
sati (sati-parisuddhi).(注 5) None of these jhanic
traits could be given up by any meditator who is
striving to advance further than the forth
jhana.Purified sati constitutes the very essence of
the mental state of an advanced meditator.Its presence
in the first arupya meditation is to be taken for
granted even though it is not mentioned by name in the
jhanic formula.Moreover the feeling (vedana ? )
adukkhamasukham being a neutral feeling, is not an
impediment to spiritual growth, and so need not be
given up.(注 6) We may even insist that this neutral
feeling must be preserved, for the absence of this
feeling would automatically give rise to some other
feeling which would agitate the mind.The point to be
taken note of in this respect is that none of the mental
factors in the fourth jhana is dispensable, or should
be given up.
On the basis of the above discussion we may
conclude that the mere absence of rejection of a