this moment he is no longer aware of vitakka and
vicara.When he emerges from the first jhana he again
becomes aware of vitakka and vicara and understands
that they act as hindrances to the development of
mental concentration and the proper enjoyment of
ptisukha.So it is vitakka and vicara that make the
first jhana gross (olarika). This judgemental
deliberation which is no longer termed vitakka-vicara,
creates
──────────────
(32) For the discussion in this para, see note no. 170
(p.339) of the English translation of the
Abhidharmakosabhasya,Vol.I;also see the reference
given in the note no.27 of the present article.
479 页
aversion for vitakka and vicara, takes his mind away
from them, and calms down the vitakka and
vicara.Consequently his concentration develops and he
attains the second jhana of pitisukha of a subtler type
born of concentration (samadhijam pitisukham
dutiyyajhanam) which is to him the highest nibbana
attainable in this world.In his case the development
of samadhi is incidental, and it finds mention in
the formula only because it gives rise to a subtler
type of pitisukha.
Arising from the second jhana he perceives the
grossness of the mental state due to the existence of
piti which agitates the mind.So he again practices
judgemental deliberations the contents of which deal
with the grossness of the second jhana due to the
existence of piti. As in the case of judgemental
deliberation regarding vitakka-vicara, here also the
existence of deliberations is not explicitly
acknowledged in the formula, but the role it plays can
be inferred from the phrase "pitiya viraga" which
draws our attention to the meditative process leading
to the detachment from piti.Consequently in the third
jhana he experinces pure sukha undisturbed by the
influence of piti.In this state sukha stands for
Nibbana.
Emerging from the third jhana the meditator,
however, notices the grossness
──────────────
(33) The accounts given about the meditative