How will there occur a going of present-being-gone-to
　　   When  there  never  obtains  a  double　　 going　　 of
　　   present-being-gone-to?

　　　　　　　　　　　　  p.291

　　   On this reading the argument  is against the model of
　　   motion  which  assumes  that both time and space  are
　　   discontinuous;  thus it parallels  in function Zeno's
　　   paradox   of  the  Stadium.   Suppose  that  time  is
　　   constituted  of indivisible minims of duration d, and
　　   space is constituted of indivisible  minims of length
　　   s.  Now suppose three adjacent minims of space, A, B,
　　   and C, and suppose  that  an object  of length  1s at
　　   time  t[0] occupies  A and at time  t[1] occupies  C.
　　   such that the interval t[0]-t[1] is 1d. Now since the
　　   object  has been displaced  two minims of space, that
　　   is.  2s, this means that its displacement velocity is
　　   v=2s/d. For the object to go from A to C, however, it
　　   is clearly necessary  that it traverse  B, and so the
　　   question naturally arises, When did the object occupy
　　   minim B? Since displacement A-B is 1s, by our formula
　　   we conclude that the object occupied B at t[0] +1/2d.
　　   This result  is clearly  impossible, however, since d
　　   is posited  as an indivisible  unit of time.  And yet
　　   the notion  that the object  went from A to C without
　　   traversing  B is unacceptable.  In order to reconcile
　　   theory  with fact, we might posit an imaginary  going
　　   whereby  the  object  goes  from  A through  B to  C,
　　   alongside  the orthodox  interpretation  whereby  the
　　   object goes directly  from A to C without  traversing
　　   B.  This model requires two separate goings, however,
　　   and that  is clearly  absurd.  Thus  we must conclude
　　   that  there  is no  going  of  present-being-gone-to,
　　   since  the requisite  notion  of an extended  present
　　   leads to absurdity.
　　　　  If we accept  Teramoto's  or May's  reading, then
　　   II.3 becomes:

　　   Then   how   will   there　　 obtain　　 a   going   of
　　   present-being-gone-to,
　　   Since   there   never   obtains　　 a   nongoing　　 of
　　   present-being-gone-to?

　　   This may be taken as an argument against the model of
　　   motion  which  presupposes  discontinuous  time but a
　　   spatial continuum.  Suppose  that time is constituted
　　   of indivisible minims of duration d, Now suppose that
　　   a point  is moving  along  a line a-c at such  a rate