space and time. This conception must have been dealt
a severe blow by the Pythagorean discovery that the
hypotenuse of a unit right triangle was
incommensurable with its sides, and that therefore
there could be no one unit, however small, of which
both could be composed. Attempts to resolve this
difficulty led to great ambiguity as to the nature of
atoms, which varied according to context from
entities of definite magnitude to dimensionless
points and instants. The Pythagoreans maintained both
that the world was composed of atoms and that any
magnitude was infinitely divisible, No one definition
of the atom would suffice. If it were taken to have
definite magnitude, then there would be lines which
could not be bisected, and no magnitude would be
infinitely divisible; if, on the other hand, the atom
were made dimensionless to give infinite
divisibility, no quantity of such atoms could ever
add up to any magnitude at all. According to
Brumbaugh, Zeno's Paradoxes were designed to bring
out the inherent absurdities of such a world view and
to show that, however one interpreted this position,
whichever of its premises one adopted, no account of
motion could be given which did not end in
absurdity, Whether space and time were atomistic or
infinitely divisible, no intelligible account of
motion through them was possible.
There are four possible combinations here: Space
might be continuous (that is, infinitely divisible)
and time discrete (that is, composed of extended
minims or atoms); or space might be discrete and time
continuous; or both might be continuous; or, again,
both might be discrete. The Bisection Paradox,
Achilles and the Tortoise, the Arrow, and the Stadium
are designed to refute, respectively, each of these
possibilities. Each Paradox depends for its effect
upon its proper suppressed premise concerning the
nature of space and time.
The Bisection Paradox assumes that space is
continuous (infinitely divisible) and time discrete
(atomistic). Zeno presents it as follows:
p.283
... The first asserts the non-existence of motion on