《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Introduction >>

Zeno and Naagaarjuna on motion(3)

分享到:

     space and time.  This conception must have been dealt
     a severe blow by the Pythagorean  discovery that  the
     hypotenuse   of   a   unit   right   triangle   was
     incommensurable  with  its sides, and that  therefore
     there  could be no one unit, however  small, of which
     both  could  be composed.  Attempts  to resolve  this
     difficulty led to great ambiguity as to the nature of
     atoms,  which  varied  according   to  context   from
     entities  of  definite  magnitude   to  dimensionless
     points and instants. The Pythagoreans maintained both
     that  the world  was composed  of atoms  and that any
     magnitude was infinitely divisible, No one definition
     of the atom would  suffice.  If it were taken to have
     definite  magnitude, then there would  be lines which
     could  not  be bisected, and  no magnitude  would  be
     infinitely divisible; if, on the other hand, the atom
     were   made   dimensionless   to   give   infinite
     divisibility, no quantity  of such atoms  could  ever
     add  up  to  any  magnitude  at  all.   According  to
     Brumbaugh, Zeno's  Paradoxes  were designed  to bring
     out the inherent absurdities of such a world view and
     to show that, however one interpreted  this position,
     whichever  of its premises one adopted, no account of
     motion   could   be   given  which  did  not  end  in
     absurdity, Whether  space and time were atomistic  or
     infinitely  divisible,  no  intelligible  account  of
     motion through them was possible.
      There are four possible combinations  here: Space
     might be continuous  (that is, infinitely  divisible)
     and  time  discrete  (that  is, composed  of extended
     minims or atoms); or space might be discrete and time
     continuous;  or both might be continuous;  or, again,
     both  might  be  discrete.   The  Bisection  Paradox,
     Achilles and the Tortoise, the Arrow, and the Stadium
     are designed  to refute, respectively, each  of these
     possibilities.  Each Paradox  depends  for its effect
     upon its proper  suppressed  premise  concerning  the
     nature of space and time.
      The  Bisection  Paradox  assumes  that  space  is
     continuous  (infinitely  divisible) and time discrete
     (atomistic). Zeno presents it as follows:


              p.283

    

     ...  The first asserts the non-existence of motion on