unable  to locate  real motion, one will likewise  be
　　   unable　　 to　　 discern　　 a　　 gone-to　　 and
　　   present-being-gone-to.  This  means, however, that we
　　   will never succeed in designating  a commencement  of
　　   going. Naagaarjuna summarizes the results of II:12-13
　　   in verse 14:

　　   Gata^m ki^m gamyamaana^m kimagata^m ki^m vikalpyate
　　   ad.r'syamaana aarambhe gamanasyaiva sarvathaa.

　　   The　　 gone-to　　 present-being-gone-to,　　 the
　　　　  not-yet-gone-to, all are mentally
　　   The beginning of going not being seen in any way.

　　　　  In the  remaining  verses  of Chapter  II (15-25)
　　   Naagaajuna  continues  his task of refuting motion by
　　   defeating  various formulations  designed to show how
　　   real motion is to be analyzed.  Thus, for example, in
　　   II:15 the opponent argues for the existence of motion
　　   from the existence  of rest;  that is, since  the two
　　   notions  are relative, if the one has real reference,
　　   the other must also.  In particular we may speak of a
　　   goer ceasing to go. As Naagaarjuna shows in II:15-17,
　　   however, the designation  of this  abiding   goer  is
　　   even more difficult  than  the designation  of a goer
　　   who  actually   goes.   There   are  also   arguments
　　   concerning the relationship between goer and activity
　　   of going, and the relationship  between goer and that
　　   which is to be gone-to.  None of these introduces any
　　   new style  of argumentation, however;  all seem to be
　　   variations   on   objections   already   raised.   In
　　   particular, none of the arguments  presented in these
　　   verses　　 is   susceptible　　 to　　 a   "mathematical
　　   Interpretation.  Thus we shall bring our analysis  of
　　   MMK II to a close here, merely noting in passing that
　　   where Zeno has four Paradoxes, one designed to refute
　　   each permutation of the ramified

　　　　　　　　　　　　  p.297

　　   Pythagorean   spatiotemporal　　 analysis,   we   have
　　   succeeded in uncovering  only three such arguments in
　　   Naagaarjuna.  The 'first  (II: 1) covers  the case of
　　   infinitely  divisible space and infinitely  divisible
　　   time;  the  third  (II.12-13) deals  with  infinitely
　　   divisible  time, and  thus  covers  the two cases  of
　　   discontinuous  space and infinitely  divisible  time,
　　   and  continuous  or infinitely  divisible  space  and
　　   infinitely  divisible time (already covered by II:1).