《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Research >>

THE PROBLEMS OF THE "AATYANTIKA" IN KUEI

分享到:

             P.381

              Summary

     The Praj~naapaaramitaa-hrdaya-suutra( 般若波罗蜜多心

     经 )is not one  of the  Vij~naanavaada's  texts, but

     Kuei-chi  (窥基  )in his PPHV(  般若波罗蜜多心经幽赞

     )explains its meanings with Vij~naanavada's theories

     by means  of not only  borrowing  the theories  from

     LAS( 楞伽经 ), MSA (大乘庄严经论  )and YCBH 瑜伽师地

     论 )etc., but also reconstructing  their theories as

     his new theories.  Of these the "aatyantika" (阿颠底

     伽 )appears  in PPHV as the Fifth Nature implicating

     three probledms, therefore, I explain  in this paper

     these  three problems  as follows:(1) Concering  the

     First Problem of why Kuei-chi omits the "icchantika"

     (一阐提伽 )and "an-icchantika" or "aacchantika (阿阐

     提伽 )in PPHV, I deal  with the theories  of LAS,MAS

     and YCBH for the purpose  of finding  out the reason

     which Kuei-chi  claims that "agotra"  (无种姓 ), the

     Fifth  Nature, contains  three  kinds: "icchantika",

     "anicchantika"  and "atyantika" in his VMSVY [c-k] (

     成唯识论掌中枢要 ).(2) The Second Problem is that if

     Kuei-chi   does   not   support   the  theories   of

     "maahakaru.na-bodhisattva"  (大悲菩萨 ), why does he

     claim in PPHV that "avalokite'svara-bodhisattva" (观

     自在菩萨 )has completed  Enlightment? Regarding this

     problem,   I   deal   with   the   theories   of

     Saddharmapu.n.darika's  Commentary( 法华玄赞 ), PPHV

     and YCBh's Commenetary (瑜伽论记 )for the prupose of

     proving that Kuei-chi permits the theories of

     Mahaakaru.na-bodhisattva.  (3) The Third Problem  is

     that  if  Kuei-chi   holds  that  "agotra"  is  only

     "atyantaagotra"  (毕竟无种姓  ), why does he in PPHV

     not only exlpain that both 8th and 7th vij~nanas are

     good natures, but also select the "buddha-gotra" (佛

     性 )and "tathaagata-garbha"  (如来藏  )etc.  for the

     explanations of the natures of " chien-hsiang-cheng-

     hsing"  (遣相证性  ), one of the Five  Vij~nanavada-

     perceptions (五重唯识观 )? For this problem, I first

     make  a comparative  table  and  then  expain  their

     meanings for

 

 

              P.382