IV Conclusion

　　　　  The PPH (心经 )is not the Vij~naanakaana's text,

　　   but Kuei-chi in his PPHV explains  its meanings with

　　   the Vij~naanavaada's  theories by means of borrowing

　　   the  theories   from  YCBh  and  MSA  et.,  He  also

　　   reconstructs  their theories as his new theories, in

　　   which the "aatyantika"  appesrs  in PPHVas the Fifth

　　   Nature implicating three problems.

　　　　  As concering  the First Prolem  of why" Kuei-chi

　　   omits the "icchantika" and "an-icchantid,LA in PPHV,

　　   I deal with the theories of "agotra"  in LAS and MSA

　　   for the purpose  of proving  that Kuei-chei  selects

　　   not  only  the two  "icchantikas"  of LAS  for  this

　　   "icchantika"   and  "anicchantika",  but  also   the

　　   "atyntaaparinirvaa.na-dharma"  (毕竟无涅盘法 )of MSA

　　   for his "aatyantika", the Fifth  Nature.Although  he

　　   selects the above three to make his new theories  of

　　   "agotra",   he   on   the   other   hand,   in   his

　　   VMSVY[c-k]mentions  that "icchantiio"  als has three

　　   kinds   of   (1)   "breaking　　 good   roots"　　 (2)

　　   "Mahaakaru.necchantika" (大悲阐提 )and (3) "agotra",

　　   of these  the  first  two will  finally  attain  the

　　   nirvaa.na,  but  only  the  third  "aattyantika"  of

　　   "agotra" or "agotra" of "icchantika"  absolutely can

　　   not attain nirvaana.

　　　　  Because  of the "aatyantika", the Fares  Nature,

　　   and the other four natures  (three vehicles  and one

　　   "anityata") appearing in PPHV have connections  with

　　   YCBH, therefore  I deal  with  the theories of  four

　　   "gotras'  in the BSBh, the YCBH  VOL.37.  Which  are

　　   reconstructed  by Kuei-chi, in which I find that, in

　　   PPHV, not  only  the "anityata"  is an adittion, but

　　   also   the  "aatyantika"   is  a  substitution   for

　　   "agotra",the true meaning of "atyantaaparinirvaa.na-

　　   dharma".  Anyway  the problem of why Kuei-chi  omits

　　   the other two "icchantikas"(impling the Mahaakaruna-

　　   bodhisattva) in PPHV is not yet resolvd.

　　　　  The Sekand problem is that, if Kuei-chi does not

　　   support the theories  of "Mahaakaru.na-bodhisattva",

　　   why　　 does　　 he　　 claim   in   PPHV　　   that