"agotrastha-pudgala", In addition he not only chages

　　   No.4 "agotra"  to "aatyantika", but also takes  away

　　   the name  of No.3, combines  it with Nos.  1.2.  and

　　   name "three vehicles"  without any explanation about

　　   these five natures.

　　　　  Now let us see the following statements  of BSBh

　　   for understanding the meanings of "agotra".

　　   A."agotra-stha.h  pudgalo  gotre  'sati cittopade'pi

　　　　 yatna-samaa'sraye  satyabhavya's  caanuttaraayaa.h

　　　　 samyaksa^mbodheh paripuuraye." 18 (When the person

　　　　 existing  without  "gotra"  does  not live  in the

　　　　 "gotra", he is unable  in the  completion  of  the

　　　　 unsurpassed and perfect enlightenment, even though

　　　　 he produces intention  and makes the effort as the

　　　　 support).

　　   B."asati tu gotre sarve.na sarva^m sarvathaa  bodher

　　　　 apraptir   eva   veditavya"   19  (It  should   be

　　　　 understand  that if there  is no gotra, there will

　　　　 be always  without  getting  bodhi all entirelly).

　　　　  The above  statements  tell us that the "agotra"

　　   in　　 BSBh　　 is　　 only　　 the　　 meaning　　 of

　　   "atyantaaparinirvaa.na-dharma"  of MSA  without  the

　　   meanings of two types of "icchantika"  of LAS.  This

　　   is  why  Kuei-chi   changes  the  "agotra"  to   the

　　   aatyantika", since  he  likes  to  accord  with  the

　　   theories  of YCBh.  But the problem  of why he omits

　　   the  explanations  of icchamita"  and an-icchantimas

　　   (the Mahaakaru.na-bodhisattva) in PPHV in not

　　　　　　　　　　　　  P.388

　　   yet resolved.

　　   II. The Second Problem of "aatyantika"

　　　　  If Kuei-chi forgets the meanings of "icchantika"

　　   and "an-icchantika" (the Mahaakaru.na-bodhisattva),

　　   and　　 does　　 not   support　　 the   theories　　 of

　　   Bodhisattvecc.hantika  (菩萨阐底  ), why does  he in

　　   PPHV  claim  that  the "avalokite'svara-bodhisattva"

　　   has completed Enlightenment as follows? 20

　　　　  "The   Avalokite'svara　　 first   produces   the