vol.593, MSA  (Mahaayaanasuutraannkara, 大乘庄严经论

　　   ) vol.1.,  and  YCBh   (Yogaacarabhuumi,  瑜伽师地论

　　   )vol.21.for  the purpose of proving that these texts

　　   mentioned  the  FDN.  But  he does  not explain  the

　　   meanings of the FDN, because in his other

　　　　　　　　　　　　  P.383

　　   commentary  of VMSVy[c-k](  成唯识论掌中枢要  ),4 he

　　   has already explicated them in all details.  In them

　　   we find the Fifth "agotra" (without  lineage, 无种姓

　　   )  containing (1)   " icchantika " ( 一阐提伽 )  (2)

　　   "an-icchantika,  or  "aacchantika"(  阿阐提伽  ) and

　　   (3)"atyantika"( 阿颠底伽,ah-tien-chi-chia).

　　　　  Now this "atyantika" appears as the Fifth Nature

　　   ("gotra", lineage) with the other three  natures  of

　　   the three vehicles(  三乘 )and one nature "anityata"

　　   (不定  , undetermined  one), in  his  commentary  of

　　   PPHS.5  (Praj~naapaaramitaa-hrdaya-suustra, 般若波罗

　　   蜜多心经),named Pan-jo-po-lo-mito-hsin-chin-yu-tsan,

　　   (般若波罗蜜多心经赞 ).  These five names of FDN only

　　   appear as the representotions  of the five different

　　   persons in practicing the boddhisattva's  path (菩萨

　　   行 )without  any explanation  of their meanings  and

　　   characteristics in PPHV.

　　　　  PPHS(   心经   ) ,  of   course,  is   not   the

　　   Vij~naanavaada's  text, but  Kuei-chi  explains  the

　　   practicing PP (Praj~napaaramita, 般若波罗蜜多 ), the

　　   Second  "cittauttaapana"6  (第二练磨心  ), with  the

　　   theories   of  the   vij~naanavaada,  in  which   he

　　   sometimes  explains  with  his own special  theories

　　   which  are  different  from  not only  the texts  of

　　   Tri^m'sikaa, VMS, but also  the YCBh.  If we compare

　　   these  theories, we will find that this "aatyantika"

　　   in PPHV has some problems. Therefore, I will attempt

　　   to explain  in  this  paper  what  the meanings  and

　　   problems this "aatyantika" has in the PPHV.

　　   I. The First Problem of "aatyantika"

　　   (A) The "agotra" in LAS & MSA"

　　　　  Why  does   Kuei-chi   omit   "icchantika"   and

　　   "an-icchantika"  in  the  PPHV? As  concerning  this