《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Introduction >>

Who understands the four alternatives of the Buddhist texts?(11)

分享到:

     Tathaagata has not the closed fist of a teacher with
     regard   to   doctrines.'"(28)   From   the   modern
     Theravaadin  standpoint, Candrakiirti's  explanation
     attributes to the Buddha precisely such an inner and
     outer,  because  it  portrays  the  Buddha  teaching
     worldly  beings  (=  the  outer)  in  the  realistic
     manner, and then teaching those beings once they had
     become  disciples  (= the  inner) in the illusional
     manner. And going on with a still different teaching
     to  certain  advanced   disciples.   But  that  same
     scriptural passage from the traditional, last sermon
     of the Buddha  could  be taken  differently  than it
     usually   is,   and   perhaps   consistently   with
     Naagaarjuna's  verse as Candrakiirti  understood it.
     That is because the original  Paali (Diigha-Nikaaya,
     ii, 100) reads: mayaa dhammo  anantara.m  abaahira.m
     karitvaa  (By  me was the  Dhamma  preached  without
     inner, without  outer).  The phrase "without  inner,
     without  outer" can be restated  as "with neither an
     inner  nor an outer."  And then just as the "neutral
     feeling"  (neither pleasure  nor pain) is not either
     pleasure or pain, so also one could not determine if
     the Buddha's doctrine was either inner or outer, and
     one homogeneous  character, wearisome  by repetition
     of  the  same   doctrine   over   and  over   again.
     Naagaarjuna's

              P.10

     verse, by use of the word anu`saasana, seems to mean
     that the Tathaagata, without  the closed fist, would
     gladly  communicate  in a graduated  manner  so that
     disciples in different stages of progress could have
     a teaching suited to their particular  level.  While
     this  position  may not be agreeable  to some modern
     exponents  of the Theravaada  tradition, it is not a
     'Mahaayaana'  quarrel  with the earlier 'Hiinayaana'
     school, because  also Buddhaghosa  of the Theravaada
     tradition  in his  Atthasaalinii  insists  that  the
     Buddha's   teaching   was  fittingly   modified   in
     accordance with the varying inclinations of both men
     and gods.(29)

     III.  THE FOUR  ALTERNATIVES  APPLIED  TO CAUSATION,
     EACH DENIED

     Starting  with the Buddha's  first  sermon, the four
     Noble  Truths  have  been  a  basic  ingredient   of
     Buddhist  thinking  and attitudes.  Of these Truths,
     the first is the Noble  Truth  of Suffering;  and of