By svabhaava ons understands this innate nature,
uncreate, which has not deviated in the fire in the
past, present, and future; which did not arise
earlier and will not arise later; which is not
dependent on causes and conditions as are the heat
of water, (one or another) of this side and the
other side, long and short. Well, then, does this
own-nature of fire that is of such manner (i.e.
uncreate, not dependent) exist? (In reply: ) This
(svabhaava of such sort) neither exists nor does not
exist by reason of own-nature. While that is the
case, still in order to avoid frightening the
hearers, we conventionally make affirmations (such
as `It is svabhaava' and 'It is dharmataa') and say
it exists.(65)
NOTES
1. Tso^n-kha-pa's Lam rim chen mo, the sections
'Calming the Mind and Discerning the Real'. The
four-alternatives discussion occurs in the
'Discerning the Real' section.
2. The passage is in the Tibetan Tanjur, photo
edition, vol. 103, pp. 39-4-8 to 40-2-2.
3. K. N. Jayatilleke, "The Logic of Four
Alternatives," Philosophy East and West, 17: 1967):
82; hereafter cited as Jayatilleke, "Logic."
4. Richard H. Robinson, book review of
Jayatilleke, Early Buddhist Theory. Philosophy East
and West 19, no. 1 (Jan., 1969): 72-81., see
especially 75-76; hereafter cited as Robinson,
book-review.
5. Richard H. Robinson, "Some Logical Aspects of