《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Introduction >>

Who understands the four alternatives of the Buddhist texts?(24)

分享到:

     considered, constitute  a  preliminary  orientation.
     The  alternatives  of causation, each  denied, are a
     meditation  with upholding  of human reason with its
     inferences,   definitions,   and   the   like.   The
     alternatives   of  existence,  each  denied,  are  a
     meditation   with  ultimate  downgrading   of  human
     reason, Then to answer  more along the lines  of the
     way   Candrakiirti   writes:  --Whether   one   who
     understands  arises  or does  not arise, "this  true
     nature  of dharmas  abides,"--the svabhaava  of that
     sort.  So  Candrakiirti  says  in his  Prasannapadaa
     commentary on Madhyamaka-kaarikaa, chapter XV:

     By svabhaava  ons understands  this  innate  nature,
     uncreate, which has not deviated  in the fire in the
     past,  present, and  future;  which  did  not  arise
     earlier  and will  not  arise  later;  which  is not
     dependent  on causes and conditions  as are the heat
     of water, (one  or another) of  this  side  and  the
     other  side, long  and short. Well, then, does  this
     own-nature  of fire  that  is of such  manner  (i.e.
     uncreate,  not  dependent) exist? (In  reply: ) This
     (svabhaava of such sort) neither exists nor does not
     exist  by reason  of own-nature.  While  that is the
     case,  still  in  order  to  avoid  frightening  the
     hearers, we conventionally  make affirmations  (such
     as `It is svabhaava'  and 'It is dharmataa') and say
     it exists.(65)

              NOTES

      1.  Tso^n-kha-pa's Lam rim chen mo, the sections
     'Calming  the Mind  and  Discerning  the Real'.  The
     four-alternatives   discussion   occurs   in   the
     'Discerning the Real' section.

      2.  The passage  is in the Tibetan Tanjur, photo
     edition, vol. 103, pp. 39-4-8 to 40-2-2.

      3.   K.  N.  Jayatilleke,  "The  Logic  of  Four
     Alternatives," Philosophy  East and West, 17: 1967):
     82; hereafter cited as Jayatilleke, "Logic."

      4.   Richard   H.   Robinson,  book  review   of
     Jayatilleke, Early Buddhist Theory.  Philosophy East
     and  West  19,  no.  1  (Jan.,  1969):  72-81.,  see
     especially  75-76;   hereafter  cited  as  Robinson,
     book-review.

      5. Richard H. Robinson, "Some Logical Aspects of