Mahaayaanottaratantra`saastra, ed.  E.  H,  Johnston
　　   (Patna: Bihar Research Society,  1950).  pp.  10-11;
　　   Confer,  also  Jikido   Takasaki,  A  Study  on  the
　　   Ratnagotravibhaaga  (Uttaratantra)  (Roma:  Istituto
　　   Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente, 1966), pp.
　　   163-166.

　　　　  49. Bosanquet, The Essentials of Logic, p. 129.

　　　　  50. Murti, The Central Philosophy, p. 126.

　　　　  51. Frederick J.  Streng,  Emptiness: A Study in
　　   Religion  Meaning (Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon Press,
　　   1967), p. 149.

　　　　  52.  The passage is translated in the context of
　　   its citation in Tso^n-kha-pa's  Lam rim chen mo.  It
　　   is   number   69   in   A.　　 Stael-Holstein,   ed.,
　　   Kaa`syapaparivarta,  (Commercial  Press, 1926),  but
　　   original Sanskrit is not extant for this passage.

　　　　  53.  Referred  to in note 1, herein.  There were
　　   many Tibetan controversies on this issue.

　　　　  54.  J. W. de Jong, "The Problem of the Absolute
　　   in  the  Madhyamaka   school, "  Journal  of  Indian
　　   Philosophy 2 (1972): 1-6.

　　　　  55.  The passage  occurs in the Tibetan  Tanjur,
　　   photo  edition.  vol.  98, pp.  151-2-3  to 151-2-7,
　　   immediately  preceded by Candrakiirti's  citation of
　　   MK XV, 1-2.  I have translated it in Lam rim chen mo
　　   context.

　　　　  56.  While it is not possible  to deal here with
　　   the many misconceptions in Ives Waldo,  "Naagaarjuna
　　   and Analytic  Philosophy," Philosophy  East and West
　　   25,  no.  3  (July,  1975),  one  may  observe  that
　　   Candrakiirti's   passage  directly  contradicts  his
　　   remarks (p.  283) that the acceptance of `relational
　　   conditions'  (pratyaya) entails  a  denial  both  of
　　   svabhaava and of nonrelational 'significant events'.
　　   Because  Candrakiirti   accepts,  as  does  Buddhism
　　   generally.  the  pratyaya  in the  causal  chain  of
　　   Dependent Origination,  and yet he also insists here
　　   upon the svabhaava as well as on a significance (the
　　   bodhisattva's goal) that is perhaps nonrelational.

　　　　  57. Jayatilleke, "Logic," p. 82.

　　　　  58. Robinson, book review, p. 76.

　　　　　　　　　　　　  P.21

　　　　  59.  This is well stated in the Tibetan language
　　   by  Red-mda'-ba's  Commentary  to  AAryadeva's `Four
　　   Hundred  Verses', ed.  Jetsun  Rendawa  Shonnu  Lodo