P.400
without perception (a-samj~nin)" or "I shall have
neither perception nor non-perception. But one who
is educated, abandons ignorance and gets
knowledge... and does not have any of these
thoughts."
The passage quoted above shows that the attaa in
which these recluses and Braahma.nas believed could
be in four different ways connected with the five
skandhas and this connection is constant. The
existence of an attaa without any reference to the
skandhas was unthinkable. This association of the
soul with the skandhas gave rise to certain
ego-centric thoughts in which both these
elements-the soul and the skandhas-are present, e.g.
"I am this" "I shall be material" etc.
Here we have a succinct description of a false
view that draws our attention to its two main
features: 1) attaa refers to an individual soul
whose essence consists of an awareness of 'I' (22a);
2) attaa is invariably connected with the skandhas.
Its existence is always conceived in association
with skandhas. This heresy, as already noted, came
to be known as satkaayad.r.s.ti (Pali:
Sakkaayadi.t.thi). The term satkaaya refers to the
five aggregates of attachment (pa~ncupaadaanakkhand-
haa) (23) and Satkaayad.r.s.ti to a false view that
fails to see the skandhas merely as skandhas, but
always views them through the prism of an attaa. The
most subtle from of satkaayad.r.s.ti is discernible
in the feeling " I am" which lingers in anybody who
is spiritually below the status of an arhat. He may
no longer consciously believe in
────────────
(22a) In the Alagaddupamasuttam of the Majjhima
Nikaaya (PTS), Vol. I, pp.138ff. (Nalanda
Ed.), Vol.I, pp.185 ff. We read that the
feelings of 'I' and 'mine' are interdependent.
And with "I" and "mind" to be really and truly
existing, the possibility of this false view
would also be there: "That is the world, that
is attaa. I shall be after death, everlasting,