《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Research >>

Attaa, Nirattaa, and Anattaa in the early Buddhist literatur(22)

分享到:

     not an individual  soul.  The Aatman  is the supreme

     reality, the  only  Being  that  is  beyond  speech,

     beyond  the reach  of mind and the notion  of space.

     And such an Aatman  can by no strech  of imagination

     be equated  with any of the skandhas.  In short, the

     sassato  attaa  of the Buddhist  scriptures  and the

     Aatman  of  the  Upanisads   are  two  diametrically

     opposing points of view.

      So long we have discussed  scriptural  materials

     which are more or less descriptive in nature. Now we

     pay   attention   to  a  more   critical   type   of

     Aagama-Nikaaya  passages  which acquaint us with the

     reasons for the rejection of different types of ataa

     heresies, and thereby  provide  us with  some  extra

     details regarding these heresies.

 

              IV

 

      We have  seen  that  four kinds  of relationship

     between the attaa and the skandhas  were recognised.

     Out of these only one type of relationship viz. that

     of identity  between  the  attaa  and the  skandhas,

     finds  prominent  mention  in the Nikaayas  and  the

     Aagamas.  This  appears  to have  been  the dominant

     heresy at the

 

 

              P.409

 

     time of the Buddha.  Only  in a few cases  the early

     buddhist   canon   takes  note  of  other  types  of

     relationship, viz.  attaa has skandhaka  or attaa is

     not a particular type of skandhaka. Again the nature

     and contents  of such  a criticism  of attaa  heresy

     vary depending  on the type  of persons  for whom it

     was meant.  The discourses  which  are held  for the

     benefit  of the Buddhist  monks are quite  different

     from those meant for non-Buddhist asceties.

      With these preliminary  remarks  we will proceed

     to arrange the relevant materials  according  to the

     type of heresies criticised  and the type of persons

     addressed.

 

     A: Criticism  of heresies  meant  for  the  Buddhist

     monks

 

      i) Rejection  of Satkaayad.r.s.ti: The sa^myutta

     passage  referred  to  above  is  a  plain  form  of

     instruction   discarding   the   heresy   of