《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Research >>

Attaa, Nirattaa, and Anattaa in the early Buddhist literatur(9)

分享到:

     philosophico-religious  system".   Rahulo  seems  to

     suggest  in not  so abmiguous  term  that  even  the

     Brahman-Aatman  concept  of  the  Upani.sads  stands

     hereby negated.

      It is clear that the concept  of the Upani.sadic

     Aatman acts as a powerful background  in influencing

     the formulations of both the above-mentioned  views.

     Conze, (21) on the other hand, propounds a different

     theory  which is not connected  with the Upani.sadic

     Aatman in any way. He is not sure what notions of an

     aataman  were deined  by the Buddha, but he believes

     that  these  notions  are  of two  kinds, e.g.i) the

     ideas implied  in the use of 'I' and 'mine', and ii)

     the  philosophical  opinion  of  the  Saa^mkhya  and

     Vaisse.sika.  The basic formula absence of a self is

     confined  to the five skandhas, and nothing  is said

     either  way about  its existence  quite  apart  from

     them.  The Buddha never taught that the self is not,

     only that it cannot be apprehended.

      It is obvious  that the solution  of this knotty

     problem  hinges  on the proper understanding  of the

     nature of attaa that was rejected by the Buddha.  It

     is really  strange  that  none  of the scholars  who

     suggested  the equation  of attaa  either  with  the

     Upani.sadic   Brahman-Aatman   or  with  some  other

     non-buddhist   concepts   ever   tried   to  clearly

     enunciate  what this attaa  is.  Any such suggestion

     without first defining the concept of attaa is bound

     to   be   methodologically   unscientific   and

     unconvincing.

      To arrive  at a more  objective  conclusion  the

     following  approach  may  be suggested.  On the one

     hand  we should  study  those  materials  from  the

     Nikaaya and

     ────────────

     (19) Rahulo. What the buddha taught, p.51

     (20) Ibid, p.55

     (21) The Buddhist Thought in India, pp.38-39 (George

       Allen & Unwin, London, 1962)

 

 

              P.399

 

     Aagama which are more or less descriptive in nature,

     Such  materials  provide  us with legends  and other

     informantions about the attaa philosophy dominant in

     the  region  where  the  Buddha  was  preaching  his

     anattaa doctrine, and so engaged his attention.  The