Creator, Father of all that are and are to be. And
the other beings also thought that they have been
created by Mahaabrahmaa. Their lives are of shorter
duration than that of Mahaabrahmaa. They die in the
Brahma-palace and are reborn here in this world.
Here one of them leads a religious life and can
remember his past existence in the Brahma-palace,
but not beyond that. He thinks of Mahaabrahmaa as
creator permanent, fixed, eternal, of a nature which
is not subject to transformation (nicco, dhuvo,
sassato, aviparinaamadhammo) while he regards
himself and other beings as created by Mahaabrahmaa,
impermanent, not fixed, eternal, and having the
nature of dying (ancicaa, addhuvaa, appayukaa,
cavanadhammaa).
The last part of the above account seems to be a
stock description which formed a part of the
original philosophy of the Ekaccasassatavaadins.
According to their philosophy only the uncreated is
eternal while the created is impermanent. Only
Mahaabrahmaa is eternal and the other beings are
impermanent. The information that Mahaabrahmaa was
made of mind were most probably not included in
their philosophy, for it is not mentioned in the
utterance of him who remembers his past existence.
Otherwise we have to assume that according to the
Ekaccasassatavaadins mind can be both created and
uncreated. So it appears that this extra bit of
information has been added in accordance with the
Buddhist dogma. Thus as per the understandings of
the Buddhists, the followers of the
Ekaccasassatvaada believed in an eternal soul only
in case of mahaabrahmaa and this soul was made of
mind, uncreated and immortal.
Two other groups of the Ekaccasassatavaadins
(38) believed in many eternal individual souls. But
the eternity is not absolute in these cases; it may
be lost either due to the lack of self-controll or
due to envy. The fourthe group of the
Ekaccasassatavaadins (39) were comprised of the
logicians and the thinkers who concluded by
reasoning that there are two souls, one impermanent
and the other