which, in this present life, is impermanent, is
blended of happiness and pain, and is liable to
begin and end. Wherefore, Aananda, it follows that
this aspect-'My soul in feeling'-does not commend
itself."
The passage in question rejects the view that
the individual soul is feeling. The daily experience
of people shows that the feeling is impermanent, a
blending of happiness and pain, and subject to
origination and destruction. This characterisation
of feeling will be, in the main, also acceptable to
the Ekaccasassatavaadins, for they as we have
already noted, accepted the idea that the created is
impermanent. The feeling so characterised is
different from soul. The soul thus appears to be
permanent, beyond origination and destruction, and
experiencing unmixed happiness. It is identical with
one of the skandhas.
This concept of attaa is, in all its essential
features, identical with that held by the logicians
among the Ekaccasassatavaadins who also believed the
individual soul to be eternal, and identical with
one of the skandhas belonging to the sphere of mind.
It is to be noted that the Buddha is denying the
Ekaccasassatavaada not on the strength of the law of
pa.ticcasamuppaada or any other Buddhist dogma. It
is obviously because his invoking of the higher
knowledge would cut no ice with the non-Buddhists.
He is, on the other hand, showing that the
philosophy under criticism suffers from internal
contradiction, and hence untenable. He shows that
the Ekaccasassatavaada concept of feeling is
diametrically opposed to the Ekaccasassatavaada
concept of soul, and so the view that the soul is
identical with feeling
p.419
is to be discarded.
The Mahaanidaanasutta passage supports our
conclusion that the Buddha also taught his disciples
how to defeat the upholders of the attaa heresy in
debate. Here the Buddha is teaching Aananda how to
refute the view of the Ekaccasassatavaadins. In
other words his teaching is ultimately meant for the
followers of the Ekaccasassatavaada.
iv) The mahaanidaanasutta rejects an atypical