《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Research >>

Attaa, Nirattaa, and Anattaa in the early Buddhist literatur(24)

分享到:

     wrongly   their   genuine   spiritual   experiences.

     Consequently  they  came  to  believe  in the  false

     notion  of an eternal  Mahaabrahmaa  who is made  of

     mind.   So   the   Buddha   is   here   criticising

     Ekaccasassatavaada   on  the  basis   of  his   more

     extensive knowledge.

      iv) Criticism  of heresies  in general: There is

     no legend  criticising  the  Ucchedavaada.  This  is

     because the Ucchedavaada tradition most probably did

     not record  any legend  justifying  this philosophy.

     The  Ucchedavaada  philosophy  only  recognised  the

     present  life and denied  the existence  of any life

     before birth and after death.  So there was no scope

     for the development of any such legend.

      In the Brahmahaakasyttam however, we come across

     a general criticism  of all the false views noted in

     this sutta.(42) Here the criticism  is based  on the

     more extensive knowledge and higher knowledge of the

     Buddha.  The passage  in question  states  that  the

     Buddha knows of all these false views and also knows

     of into  what sort of future  existences  fall those

     who  grasp  at and become  attached  to such  views.

     Knowing this and knowing (other) higher things (ta~n

     ca  Tathaagato   pajaanaati,  tato  ca  uttariitaram

     pajaanaati )  the Tathaagata  does not get involved,

     he knows about extinction;  and having  truly  known

     the   rising   and   passing   away   of  sensations

     (vedanaanam  samudaya~n ca atthamagama~n  ca), their

     taste,  danger,  their   not   being   the   refuge,

     Tathaagata,  due  to  the  non-attachment,  is  free

     (vimutto).

      These   are   those   other   things,  profound,

     difficult, to understand..  not to be grasped  at by

     mere logic, which Tathaagata having himself realised

     and seen face to face, has set forth."

      The  higher  knowledge  which  is  profound  and

     beyond  logic  is different  from  the knowledge  of

     future existences and past lives of the beings.  The

     phrase-"knowing   this   and  knowing(other)  higher

     things"-clearly shows  that two different  types  of

     knowledge  are  referred  to.  The higher  knowledge

     refers to the

     ────────────

     (42) Diigha Nikaaya, Vol.I, pp.16-17, 21-22, 24, 28,