《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Research >>

Attaa, Nirattaa, and Anattaa in the early Buddhist literatur(21)

分享到:

     (40) Ibid, pp.34-35

     (41) I have not mentioned  the other attaa  heresies

       described  in the Brahmajaalasutta, as they are

       not  radically  different  from  what  we  have

       discussed  in the present  article.  All  these

       heresies are also based on the Satkaayad.r.s.ti

       and  so  share   the  characteristics   of  the

       Satkaayad.r.s.ti. These  heresies  must also be

       partially  similar to  the 'Saa'svatavaadins or

       the Ekaccasassatavaadins. I could not trace any

       other  sutta  devoted  to the rejection  of any

       of these heresies. The Buddhists themselves, it

       seems, did  not think  it necessary  to discuss

       these false views separately and elaborately.

 

 

              P.408

 

     soul  of Mahaabrahmaa, who is uncreated, is eternal.

     But  the  'Saa'svatavaada  and the other  groups  of

     Ekaccasassatavaada   recognise   numerous,  eternal,

     individual  souls who are either identical  with the

     skandhas  or so  closely  related  to them  as to be

     dependent  on them  for their  very  existence.  The

     second and third groups of the Ekaccasassatavaadins,

     however, are of the opinion that the eternity is not

     absolute, for  the  beings  die if they  indulge  in

     sensual  pleasures  or are afflicted  with jealousy.

     The   first  type  of Ekaccasassatavaada  explicitly

     states  that  the  souls,  including   that  of  the

     Mahaabrahmaa, are made of mind.  This view seems  to

     have been accepted by the second and third groups of

     the Ekaccasassatavaadins  who made  the eternity  of

     the  individual  souls  dependent  on the purity  of

     mind.   According   to  the  fourth   group  of  the

     Ekaccasassatavaadins which consists of the logicians

     and the thinkers, the individual  soul  is identical

     with citta or manas or vij~naana.  Thus we find that

     the Ekaccasassatavaada  concept of soul belonged  to

     the sphere  of mind and at least in most cases could

     not rise beyond the Ruupaloka.  Moreover the eternal

     souls  are confined  within  space  and time and are

     characterised by the subject-object split.

      The  Upani.sadic  Aatman, on the other  hand, is