(40) Ibid, pp.34-35
(41) I have not mentioned the other attaa heresies
described in the Brahmajaalasutta, as they are
not radically different from what we have
discussed in the present article. All these
heresies are also based on the Satkaayad.r.s.ti
and so share the characteristics of the
Satkaayad.r.s.ti. These heresies must also be
partially similar to the 'Saa'svatavaadins or
the Ekaccasassatavaadins. I could not trace any
other sutta devoted to the rejection of any
of these heresies. The Buddhists themselves, it
seems, did not think it necessary to discuss
these false views separately and elaborately.
P.408
soul of Mahaabrahmaa, who is uncreated, is eternal.
But the 'Saa'svatavaada and the other groups of
Ekaccasassatavaada recognise numerous, eternal,
individual souls who are either identical with the
skandhas or so closely related to them as to be
dependent on them for their very existence. The
second and third groups of the Ekaccasassatavaadins,
however, are of the opinion that the eternity is not
absolute, for the beings die if they indulge in
sensual pleasures or are afflicted with jealousy.
The first type of Ekaccasassatavaada explicitly
states that the souls, including that of the
Mahaabrahmaa, are made of mind. This view seems to
have been accepted by the second and third groups of
the Ekaccasassatavaadins who made the eternity of
the individual souls dependent on the purity of
mind. According to the fourth group of the
Ekaccasassatavaadins which consists of the logicians
and the thinkers, the individual soul is identical
with citta or manas or vij~naana. Thus we find that
the Ekaccasassatavaada concept of soul belonged to
the sphere of mind and at least in most cases could
not rise beyond the Ruupaloka. Moreover the eternal
souls are confined within space and time and are
characterised by the subject-object split.
The Upani.sadic Aatman, on the other hand, is