《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Research >>

William James and Yogaacaara philosophy: A comparative inqui(11)

分享到:

     For this reason,  James  likens  consciousness  to a
     stream in which

     every definite image in the mind is steeped and dyed
     in the free water that flows  round it...  the sense
     of its relations.... The significance, the value, of
     the  image  is all  in this  halo  or penumbra  that
     surrounds  and escorts  it,--or rather that is fused
     into one with it.(31)

      On this point, Yogaacaara agrees with James that
     the stream of consciousness  conditions itself.  For
     James, each  image  in the  stream  is "steeped  and
     dyed"  by the  surrounding  images, that  is, by the
     interreferential context provided by

              P.230

     experience  itself.  For  Yogaacaara, too,  previous
     moments  in the  stream  of consciousness  condition
     later ones (Y25):

     Dualistic thought (vikalpa) is constructed  by other
     dualistic thought (Y23)

     and

     Consciousness  arises with the appearance of objects
     through the ripening of its own seeds. (Y11)

     These seeds (biija) incubate in the aalayavij~naana,
     a "store  consciousness"  that  functions  to  shape
     future  actions, perceptions, and  feelings  on  the
     basis of past ones through the action of "perfuming"
     (vaasanaa).  The aalayavij~naana is an integral part
     of abhuutaparikalpa  and, as its  underlying  causal
     basis  (hetupratyaya), is its  fundamental  or basal
     structure(Y33).

      Because of their strong emphasis on the unity of
     subject  and object  in the prereflective  phase  of
     experience  and the active  role  of the subject  in
     constructing  the  reflective  phase  of experience,
     both  James  and  Yogaacaara   have  at  times  been
     characterized  as  propounding  forms  of  idealism.
     James has been characterized as a Berkelian idealist
     by E. C. Moore and A. O.  Lovejoy.(32) Although some
     current   studies   are   disputing   this
     interpretation,(33) Yogaacaara consistently has been
     interpreted   as  idealism.   For   instance,  Ashok
     Chatterjee  says  that for Yogaacaara  the world  is
     unreal and "consciousness  is the sole reality."(34)
     Surendranath  Dasgupta claims that Yogaacaara  is an
     "uncompromising  idealism"  for which  the  external
     world   does  not  exist,  but  is  constructed   by
     "ignorant  minds."(35)  T. R. V.  Murti  calls  it