44.William James, A Pluralistic Universe, ed. Fredson
Bowers and Ignas K. Skrupskelis (Cambridge,
Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1977), p.
113.
45.Abhidharmako`sa II.50, trans. and cited by F.Th.
Stcherbatsky, Buddhist Logic (New York: Dover
Pub., 1962), vol. 1, pp. 130-131.
46.James, Pluralistic Universe, p. 32.
47.James, Essays, p. 30.
48.James, Pluralistic Universe, p. 31.
49.James, Pluralistic Universe, p. 116.
50.James, Pluralistic Universe, p. 115.
51.James, Pluralistic Universe, p. 146.
52.James, Pluralistic Universe, p. 147.
53.James, Essays, p. 46.
54.James, Essays, p. 46.
55.James, Essays, p. 66.
56.James, Pragmatism, p. 119.
57.James. Psychology, p. 14.
58.F. Th. Stcherbatsky, Buddhist Logic (New York:
Dover Pub., 1962), 2:398 n.5.
59.Gadgin M. Nagao, "The Buddhist World-View as
Elucidated in the Three-Nature Theory and Its
Similes, " Eastern Buddhist 16, no.1 (Spring
1983): 14.
60.Nagao, "Buddist World-View." p.2.
61.James, Pluralistic Universe, pp. 111-113.
Throughout the chapter he alternates between
presenting it as Bergson's position and advocating
it as his own, reached independently (pp. xxiii,
xxiii n. 8, and n. 101.3).
62.James, Pluralistic Universe,p. 118.
63.James, Essays, p. 45.
64.James, Pragmatism, p.131. Potential problems
with James's pragmatic theory of truth are
discussed by Israel Scheffler in Four Pragmatists:
A Critical Introduction to Peirce, James, Mead and
Dewey(New York: Humanities Press, 1974) , pp.
110-116.
65.James, Pluralistic Universe, p.110.
66.James, Pragatism, p. 131.