《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Research >>

William James and Yogaacaara philosophy: A comparative inqui(31)

分享到:

     Suutra  (London: Routledge  &  Kegan  Paul,  Ltd.,
     1932), p.51. The earliest Yogaacaarin to cite this
     suutra  was Sthiramati.  For  a discussion  of its
     date and association  with the Yogaacaara  school,
     see   Jikido   Takasaki,   "Sources   of   the
     La^nkaavataara  and  its  position  in  Mahaayaana
     Buddhism," in L.  A.  Hercus, ed., Indological and
     Buddhist Studies: Volume in Honour of Professor J.
     W.  de Jong  on his Sixtieth  Birthday  (Canberra,
     Australia:  Faculty   of  Asian  Studies,  1982) :
     545-568.

    44.William James, A Pluralistic Universe, ed. Fredson
     Bowers  and  Ignas  K.   Skrupskelis   (Cambridge,
     Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1977), p.
     113.

    45.Abhidharmako`sa II.50, trans. and cited by F.Th.
     Stcherbatsky,  Buddhist  Logic  (New  York: Dover
     Pub., 1962), vol. 1, pp. 130-131.

    46.James, Pluralistic Universe, p. 32.

    47.James, Essays, p. 30.

    48.James, Pluralistic Universe, p. 31.

    49.James, Pluralistic Universe, p. 116.

    50.James, Pluralistic Universe, p. 115.

    51.James, Pluralistic Universe, p. 146.

    52.James, Pluralistic Universe, p. 147.

    53.James, Essays, p. 46.

    54.James, Essays, p. 46.

    55.James, Essays, p. 66.

    56.James, Pragmatism, p. 119.

    57.James. Psychology, p. 14.

    58.F. Th. Stcherbatsky, Buddhist Logic (New York:
     Dover Pub., 1962), 2:398 n.5.

    59.Gadgin M. Nagao, "The Buddhist World-View as
     Elucidated in the Three-Nature Theory and Its
     Similes, " Eastern Buddhist 16, no.1 (Spring
     1983): 14.

    60.Nagao, "Buddist World-View." p.2.

    61.James, Pluralistic Universe, pp. 111-113.
     Throughout   the  chapter  he  alternates  between
     presenting it as Bergson's position and advocating
     it as his own, reached independently  (pp.  xxiii,
     xxiii n. 8, and n. 101.3).

    62.James, Pluralistic Universe,p. 118.

    63.James, Essays, p. 45.

    64.James, Pragmatism,  p.131. Potential problems
     with  James's   pragmatic   theory  of  truth  are
     discussed by Israel Scheffler in Four Pragmatists:
     A Critical Introduction to Peirce, James, Mead and
     Dewey(New  York:  Humanities  Press,  1974) ,  pp.
     110-116.

    65.James, Pluralistic Universe, p.110.

    66.James, Pragatism, p. 131.