《心是莲花》缘起
心是莲花是由居士自发组织建立的一个佛学平台。
《莲心论坛》交流
论坛事务区》 《莲心佛音区
莲心研修区》 《莲心红尘区
佛教人物
高僧|法师 大德|居士
信仰
菩萨信仰 诸佛信仰
您所在的当前位置:主页 >> 英语佛教 >> Research >>

William James and Yogaacaara philosophy: A comparative inqui(28)

分享到:

     their   respective   streams   of  influence,  these
     philosophies  have provided a compelling key to life
     for many people.  They both offer a perspective that
     can accommodate epistemological idealism, phenomenal
     realism, and  the  possibility  of direct, intuitive
     knowledge   of  reality,  as  well  as  a  pragmatic
     justification   for  the  linguistic   and  symbolic
     constructs used to point to that reality.

               NOTES

     1.See, for example. Kenneth Inada and Nolan Jacobson,
     eds., Buddhism and American Thinkers  (Albany, New
     York: State University  of New York Press.  1984),
     pp. vii, xv, 49, 76.

     2.See D.C.Mathur, "The Historical Buddha (Gotama),
     Hume,  and  James  on  the  Self: Comparisons  and
     Evaluations," Philosophy  East and West 28, no.  3
     (July 1978): 262-270.

     3.David Dilworth, "The Initial Formations of 'Pure
     Experience' in Nishida Kitaroo and  William
     James," monumenta  Nipponica 24, nos.  1-2 (1969):
     93-111.

     4.Dilworth, "initial Formations," p. 95. Suzuki
     probably was introduced to James' writings by Paul
     Carus,  with  whom  he  lived  and  worked   as  a
     translator, because Carus was keeping  abreast  of
     the formulation  of American  pragmatism  by James
     and Charles Sanders Peirce.  This information  was
     related  to me by Eugene Taylor  of the Department
     of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical  School, who has an
     article, "William  James  and  Swami  Vivekananda:
     Asian  Psychology  at  Harvard  in  the  1890's, "
     forthcoming  in Prabuddha  Bharata, that documents
     James'  personal   connections,  both  direct  and
     indirect, with Asian scholars.

     5.William James Earle, "William James," in Paul
     Edwards,  ed.,  Encyclopedia  of  Philosophy  (New
     York: Collier Macmillan Pub., 1973), 4:242, 246.

     6.The authorship and date of the work have not been
     determined,   although   the   commentary   and
     subcommentary can be dated with some confidence to
     the fourth or fifth century. The text itself is


              P.242


     attributed  to  a Maitreyanaatha.  who  taught  or
     revealed  it to Asa^nga.  The  exact  identity  of