inherent in communicating certain fundamental
aspects of the Dharma. As a preclude to Ch'an,
Buddhism in India already was exploring the rarefied
realm of spiritual experience that defied
verbalization. The following passage from
A.s.tasaahasrikaa Praj~naapaaramitaa outlines the
linguistic and conceptual liabilities of discussing
enlightenment:
The Enlightened One sets forth in the Great
Ferryboat (Mahaayaana); but there is nothing from
which he sets forth. He starts from the universe;
but in truth he starts from nowhere. His boat is
manned with all the perfections (paaramitaas); and
is manned by no one. It will find its supprot on
nothing whatsoever and will find its support on the
state of all-knowing, which will serve it as a
non-support. Moreover, no one has ever set forth in
the Great ferryboat; no one will ever set froth in
it, and no one is setting forth in it now. And why
is
────────────
(8) The Diamond Suutra, Charles Luk trans., included
in the Bilingual Buddhist Series, Suutras and
Scriptures, Vol.1 (Taipei, Taiwan: Buddhist
Culture Service, 1962), p.132
(9) Edward Conze notes: "For four centuries the
Scriptures went not written down, and only
existed in the memory of the monks. Like the
Brahmins, the Buddhists had a strong aversion to
writing down religious knowledge." Buddhism: Its
Essence and Development (New York: Harper & Row,
1959), p.89.
P.346
this? Because neither the one setting forth nor
the goal for which he sets forth is to be found:
therefore, who should be setting forth, and
whither? (10)
This situation created quite a quandary for those
who nonetheless sought to propagate the Dharma.
Thus, the following guidelines were set forth:
‧Rely on the teaching, not the teacher.
‧Rely on the meaning, not the letter.
‧Rely on the definitive meaning (nitaartha),